Personal Attributes of Tearchers, by Vicky

It is a well-known fact that the profession of imparting knowledge, which is no other than teaching, generates all other professions. Therefore, there has been a great deal of controversy about the most significant personal attributes that a highly effective educator should have. More specifically, at present there is a strong debate over whether high qualifications, leadership qualities, or an altruistic love for pupils is the one trait that dwarfs all others in significance.

I agree that a teacher should be highly educated and devoted to this professional development through seminars and conventions on modern teaching methods, children's psychology and any other field relevant to his subject matter. In this way, the educator becomes more efficient and accelerates the learning process for the students. It must be admitted that a poorly qualified teacher is usually the first to blame for pupils' poor knowledge. For exampl, an inadequately knowledgeable Math teacher would be unable to answer more advanced questions on mathematic problems and equations, or provide knowledge at high levels.
 
It is obvious that strong leadership skills are vital for an effective classroom management. The educator should be strict and lenient when he deems fit. He should address any disruptive behaviour and prevent or tackle bullying incidents. To put it another way, if one lacks strong leadership skills, this will ultimately give rise to a chaotic classroom environment with unruly, restless students and hence limited educational input for the whole class.

Taking everything into account, I am inclined to believe that the altruistic love for students is the most important characteristic of a highly effective teacher. Without a doubt, the pure love for teaching and for pupils is reflected in a more pleasant and efficient for them. Striving for high quality in his or her teaching a better understanding of the students' needs are exactly what is needed for the creation of a conducive learning environment and the learners' growth as persons.
 

Art as a Core Subject, by Vicky

Recently, there has been a great deal of controversy about the necessity of the Art class in the school program. It is strongly believed that the other subjects like Mathematics, Science, and Language and Literature are more significant for the pupils' education than Art. That said, I am of the opinion that art-related subjects should not be frowned upon, as they can raise the students' cultural awareness and also lay the foundation for the development of a multitude of skills.

More specifically, through art-related subjects, pupils have the opportunity to learn about the history of art, the art and culture of their country, and to be exposed to foreign culture and works of art. By trying to describe, analyze and even criticize the various works of art, children gradually get used to exploring their environment and broaden their horizons. In addition, they learn to express themselves, their feelings in a more creative way and develop critical thinking skills. Moreover, while working all together as a team though theater plays, music performances and so on, they improve their socializing and communication skills.

Despite these advantages, the opponents of this view maintain that art classes are only a waste of time and therefore students should focus on their mainstream subjects, which, according to them, are more important for their academic and professional achievement. However, I am convinced that if we were to abolish art subjects, students would have not only a monotonous school program, without a pleasant interval from the other core subjects, but would be deprived of the many associated cognitive benefits, too.

Taking all of the above into consideration, it is evident that art opens up children's minds, broadens their horizons and helps them grow as persons. It is imperative that we oppose to the exclusion of art from the school curriculum to ensure that we provide the younger generations with a well-rounded education as this will definitely lead them to find the way to change and make a better world for all of us.

 

Smoking in Public Places, by Maria

Recently, there has been a great deal of controversy about prohibiting smoking in public places or not. Given that the presence of non-smokers in these places cannot be ignored, I am inclined to believe that a happy medium between the smokers' right to freedom of choice and the non-smokers' right not to be subjected to their fumes could and should be stricken.

Suffice it to say that smoking is harmful to health and definitely linked with respiratory diseases. Scientists constantly try to persuade individuals not only to refrain from smoking, but also to steer clear of second-hand smoke. Obviously, passive smoking is as perilous as smoking. It is proven that when a person smokes, the inhalation of dangerous fumes in his or her body will gradually cause severe defects on the lungs or, worse still, cancer. Therefore, the local authorities in conjunction with the Ministry of Health recently enforced the prohibition of smoking in public areas. Needless to say that smoking must be forbidden in places where children, patients and elderly are present. In fact, individuals should be conscientious when accompanying the aforementioned sections of the population.

On the other hand, prohibition of smoking in public areas may be assumed as violation of human rights. Adult smokers are certainly aware of hazards involved in smoking but their longing for it is a personal matter  an immediate consequence of their addiction to nicotine, the highly addictive substance found in tobacco. Additionally, there are the occasional smokers who enjoy smoking a couple of cigarettes only when they attend a pop-rock concert, or when they savor a meal in a music tavern. Bearing especially the last category of smokers in mind, I tend to be in favor of creating a specially designed smoking area particularly in places of entertainment. To my mind, there is no reason to infringe upon somebody's right to light a cigarette in order to indulge himself at a moment of joy.

The obvious conclusion to be drawn is that smoking is absolutely harmful to health. But as smokers have realized the ever-increasing number of the diseases linked with their habit, they still have the freedom of choice. As far as I am concerned, it is better for both parties to compromise on the installation of smoking areas in some public places, in the high hopes of avoiding imposing fines on citizens solely for exercising their right to freedom of choice, which is by all accounts against what a democratic society encompasses.

Voting Age, by Maria

Nowadays, a matter of public interest is the appropriate age at which an individual is legally permitted to cast a ballot in elections. Given that this age differs from country to country, this issue has given rise to a great deal of controversy in many societies.

In my view, the ideal age at which someone is probably mentally capable of voting responsibly is that of 21 years old and above. It seems clear to me that a person under the aforementioned age has not developed their critical skills yet. In some countries, including ours - Greece, youngsters at the age of 18 are permitted to vote. To my mind, this section of the population mainly consists of individuals who are impressionable, careless, and impulsive owning to their youth, and this is why it is unacceptable to let them determine the future of a country, as their ultimate decision may be affected by their immaturity. On the other hand, a person at the age of 21 and above, who studies in a university or has a job, is much more likely to keep abreast of current affairs and hence more suited to forming an impartial, sound judgement while selecting the politicians who will represent not only himself but the entire nation. By having knowledge of the job market, he is obviously more efficient to make a wise choice in elections.

As far as I am concerned, the factors that may affect the age limit of voting include: completion of the secondary education, awareness of public affairs and intellectual maturity. As I have already mentioned earlier, acquiring education is vital for all member of the electorate in order to be self-conscious while opting for a party in elections. The intellectual maturity stemming from introspection is an essential factor for a voter. It is quite clear to me that if one does not have these qualities, he will never be able to make a responsible choice in the elections.

All things considered, the population of a country is highly affected by the outcome of the elections. It is crucial for the members of the electorate to vote without illiberality but according to the economic and social issues of their country combined with circumspection of our welfare. To the end, it is my firm belief that the voting age threshold should be raised from 18 to 21 years old.
 

Animals in Circuses, by Maria

Recently, a matter of public interest in our civilized world has been whether the exposure of animals in circuses means exploitation and inhumane treatment or not. This matter has given rise to much controversy between the proponents of circuses and animal activists.

It seems to me that performances in circuses are exciting and fabulous. When I was a child, I anticipated attending a show including magicians, dancers, acrobats, and, of course, animals. More specifically, people of all ages benefit from their visit to a circus as they can enjoy this fascinating experience. Therefore, the chance to see from up close a variety of animals doing extraordinary tricks and performing dangerous feats, is indeed, for us all, an amazing spectacle. It goes without saying that our admiration for these animals is unquestionable. Having said that, it must be conceded that families turn up in circuses by no means having the intention to exploit animals or laugh at them.

On the other hand, innocent wild creatures are held captive, deprived of everything that is natural and important to them. For this reason, most of them feel depressed, since they are kept in cramped cages instead of living free in the wild. Particularly wild animals are born to hunt and run long distances following their natural instincts. By default, the practice of captivity means violation of their rights. Unfortunately, not only are animals kept imprisoned, but they also endure unethical and atrocious practices so as to train hard and give a good performance in circuses. More often than not, they live under unhealthy conditions with absence of veterinarian care and are even starved to death when they have stopped being able to meet their trainers' expectations.

In conclusion, wildlife belongs in the wild and not in captivity. It appears to me that such shows exist to offer profit to the circuses' owners and that this practice is stripped of consideration of the animals' dignity and respect to their existence. By all accounts, the participation of animals in circuses is a form of torture, which is a sad truth the fans of circuses - who keep booking seats in the front row of such shows solely for their entertainment - are obviously unaware of. It would be prudent that the exposure of animals there be abolished altogether.

Children in TV Shows, by Maria

Nowadays, a point at issue in our civilized world is whether young people should take part in live talent shows on TV or not. Over the years, these shows have received quite a bit of criticism. On the other hand, they are still very popular. There is a growing trend for people to participate in TV shows, regardless of their age.

Reality or talent shows seem to be ideal for individuals who like to make an exhibition of themselves. Also, the prize appeals to people as most of them face financial or unemployment problems; it goes without saying that winning a music talent show may be a springboard for someone's career. Admittedly, youngsters are also impulsive, keen and spontaneous - traits that account for their belief that their participation in a TV show will fulfill their dreams. More specifically, they can feel encouraged by this distinction and be motivated to perform better.

On the other hand, it is common knowledge that the exhibition in a TV show conceals negative aspects, particularly for youngsters. Unfortunately, there is only one winner in each TV show. The more vulnerable a youngster is, the more frustrated he feels upon such a failure. The acceptance of defeat requires maturity and teenagers are too susceptible to handle an unsatisfactory outcome from their participation. But there are drawbacks for the winners, too. These lucky ones must adapt to a new way of life with many obligations. For instance, they must work for long hours either recording a CD, or having a rehearsal for TV shows and concerts. They may be alienated by their friends or loved ones. As a result, they are always under a great amount of pressure.

To sum up, the world of entertainment needs new artists and this is why these shows are rocketed to the top of the ratings. However, it is my firm belief that youngsters should be allowed to participate in them only as long as they pursue a balance between career and personal life. They must also be protected by the corrupt TV producers and their intentions of exploitation.

The Internet, by Maria

Nowadays, a point at issue in our civilized world is the importance of the Internet along with its positive and negative aspects, both of which should be taken into account.

First, it would be worth mentioning that numerous benefits have been provided by the Internet as an unlimited source of information, a significant medium of entertainment and an inexpensive means of communication.

The Internet can serve educational purposes by providing people with a wealth of information on any subject under the sun. For example, language learners can easily search for information using a great variety of online dictionaries. In addition, students can have access to digital educational programs. Needless to say that teachers also often resort to the Internet so as to gain knowledge on their subject matter or teaching methods.

It is commonly accepted that the Internet is a popular medium of entertainment. For instance, downloading music is a favorite occupation for individuals, regardless of their age, gender or nationality. Moreover, playing online games is considered as an amusement that brings classmates, friends or relatives together.

Another positive effect of the Internet is its usage as a means of communication. It connects people from all over the world at the simple press of a button. The potential of applications such as Skype, or social media like Twitter and Facebook, is fully realized only when one considers how much they have facilitated the communication process with our loved ones or with long-distance friends. Additionally, this important means helps connect employees, manager and customers for professional purposes in a more efficient manner.

Despite the many advantages, the drawbacks of the Internet should not be ignored. The addiction to the Internet is a current matter that should be carefully considered. Not only teenagers but also adults often lose track of time while chatting or playing games for hours on end. The excessive use of the Internet, especially by students, has raised controversy between them and parents. Of course, students had better study so as to perform better at school, instead of being glued to online games and sometimes staying up all night. But the Internet conceals another significant negative aspect. Some crooks use cunning methods with intention of stealing bank account details from chat users thus committing identity theft.

Taking everything into consideration, it is clear to me that the benefits of the Internet outweigh its drawbacks. This invention has made communication easier and cheaper. If we avoid giving personal information and use it in moderation, we shall reap all the benefits of the virtual world while at the same time avoiding its dangers.
 

Zoos: A Mixed Blessing, by Themis

Zoos are indeed a mixed blessing as they have a lot to offer to both people and non-human animals but also entail certain negative consequences which we will get back to in a minute. People benefit from their visit to zoos greatly as they - especially children -  are given the chance to see and observe from up close non-native animal species, which they would otherwise most probably see solely on book pages or a screen (unless a restless, adventurous traveler resides within them)! On a community level, people also profit from the increase in tourism that is attributed to the creation and maintenance of such wildlife parks. As far as animals are concerned, they allegedly have a lot to gain from living in captivity since they are provided with everything, from food and water to constant veterinary care, not to mention the fact that they are kept safe from hunters, predators and running the risk of extinction.

It may sound like a paradise but unfortunately this is not the case. To put everything in perspective, a zoo and an animal circus differ only in that the former usually has a research centre; other than that, for the most part they both serve as cashcow entertainment centres whose purpose is to attract visitors and part them from their money in the name of education and recreation. The burning question is, of course: what can one learn or how can one feel excitement when seeing a tortured, depressed animal confined in such small artificial spaces?

Οι ζωολογικοί κήποι φαινομενικά έχουν πολλά πλεονεκτήματα και για τους ανθρώπους και για τα ζώα που ζουν σε αυτούς, αλλά ας μην ξεχνάμε και τις ουκ ολίγες αρνητικές συνέπειες που επιφέρουν, σε μερικές από τις οποίες θα αναφερθούμε παρακάτω. Οι άνθρωποι επωφελούνται από μία επίσκεψή τους σε ζωολογικό, ειδικά τα παιδιά, γιατί τους δίνεται η ευκαιρία να δουν και να παρατηρήσουν ξένα είδη άγριων ζώων από κοντά, ζώα που κατά πάσα πιθανότητα θα βλέπανε μόνο σε σελίδες βιβλίων ή στην μικρή και μεγάλη οθόνη (εκτός κι αν κρύβουν έναν ανήσυχο, περιπετειώδη ταξιδιώτη μέσα τους)! Σε τοπικό επίπεδο μάλιστα, οι άνθρωποι επωφελούνται και οικονομικά χάρη στην αύξηση τουρισμού που συχνά αποδίδεται στην ύπαρξη μεγάλων ζωολογικών στην περιοχή. Όσον αφορά τα ζώα, υποτίθεται ότι κι αυτά επωφελούνται άμεσα από τη ζωή σε αιχμαλωσία καθώς τους παρέχονται τα πάντα, από φαγητό και νερό μέχρι διαρκή κτηνιατρική φροντίδα, για να μην αναφέρουμε το ότι προστατεύονται από κυνηγούς, ζώα-θηρευτές, και την πιθανότητα να εξαφανιστεί το είδος τους.

Μπορεί να ακούγεται σαν ένας μικρός παράδεισος για τα ζώα αυτά, αλλά δυστυχώς δεν είναι έτσι. Για να δούμε τα πράγματα στις πραγματικές τους διαστάσεις, ένας ζωολογικός κήπος και ένα τσίρκο διαφέρουν μόνο στο ότι το πρώτο συνήθως διαθέτει και ένα ερευνητικό κέντρο, κατά τ'άλλα λειτουργούν και τα δύο σαν ψυχαγωγικά κέντρα-χρυσωρυχεία των οποίων ο σκοπός είναι να προσελκύσουν πολλούς επισκέπτες και να τους πάρουν όσα περισσότερα χρήματα γίνεται στο όνομα της εκπαίδευσης και της ψυχαγωγίας. Το ερώτημα είναι: πώς είναι δυνατόν κάποιος να μαθαίνει και να ψυχαγωγείται όταν βλέπει ένα βασανισμένο, δυστυχισμένο ζώο μέσα σε τόσο μικρούς τεχνητούς χώρους;

Alternative Medicine, by Themis

 (description)